Mr Lee remarked that "If there is a weak link in our national education system, the preschool phase would be it". But the question that remains unanswered is the extent of an impact preschool education has on a child’s overall development. Singapore’s primary, secondary and tertiary education have been commended around the globe and indeed Singapore’s competitive system has shined in international education rankings for years. It could be argued that preschool is but a small, relatively insignificant component in the huge machinery of Singapore’s education system.
Furthermore, in comparing the various differences between the preschool systems of the Nordic countries with the one in Singapore, it appears that the issues are deep-set. For instance, preschool education in Finland is a lauded profession with a high pay. Moreover, local government units are obligated by law to provide heavily subsidized places in kindergartens or childcare programs.
So, in order for Singapore’s preschool education system to mimic that of Finland, there needs to be an overhaul of the system to change a market-led preschool industry to a government controlled one. Society too has to change its mindset with regards to the status of a teaching profession, in order for the industry to attract more talented individuals. Government policies also have to be altered to the point that laws, such as those in Finland, could be implemented towards a child’s ‘right to child care’ to ensure greater availability of preschools.
Ultimately, Singapore has to make drastic changes if it wishes to boost its preschool education rankings, but the question must be asked: Is it really necessary to make great changes for an arguably small part of Singapore’s education system? According to what we learnt from the Economist Intelligence Units analysis and arguments, we definitely believe so.